Investing and capital allocationLeaderboard & comparison
The accounts leaderboard: what it ranks and how to read it
This post is also available in Persian ←

The accounts leaderboard is not a simple ranking; it blends return, drawdown and consistency. Here is what each metric means and why a high rank alone is not a reason to invest.
A “top accounts” table is always tempting: just pick the first row. But the accounts leaderboard on PAMM Iran is a ranking tool, not an investment recommendation. A rank shows which account performed best in a specific window, not which account suits you. That distinction separates an informed decision from an expensive mistake.
What the accounts leaderboard measures
At /en/tam/leaderboard, accounts are ordered using a blend of metrics:
- Period return: cumulative result over a defined window, with its last update date.
- Drawdown: the deepest fall from a previous peak — the stability indicator.
- Return-to-drawdown ratio: efficiency per unit of risk, often more informative than raw return.
- Consistency: dispersion of returns across consecutive periods; an account with one great month and eleven flat months is not consistent.
- Certifications and module coverage: an active SANJESH certificate or declared GAMM rules add a transparency layer.
Why a high rank is not enough
A rank always refers to a window and a metric. An account that topped a bullish three-month window may not reproduce that risk profile in a falling market. Put three things next to the rank:
- Your horizon: a three-month rank is a weak guide for a three-year allocation.
- Your drawdown tolerance: if the top account has 30% drawdown and you panic at 10%, that rank is meaningless for you.
- Entry and exit costs: performance fee, minimum capital and settlement period are not part of the rank but hit your pocket.
Five common reading mistakes
| Mistake | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing unequal windows | Misleading conclusion | Align the time window |
| Ignoring the data source | Trusting self-declared numbers | Prefer verified data |
| Relying on one good week | Entering at the worst moment | Read the multi-month trend |
| Forgetting fees | Net return below expectation | Check the TARAZ simulator |
| Missing the account type | Ignoring Real vs Demo rules | Read the account type column |
Three filters before you open the table
Before looking at any account, set three filters from your own situation. Maximum acceptable drawdown (often 10–15% for a first allocation), minimum capital you can leave untouched for the full horizon, and the methods you actually understand. Only then open the leaderboard. Screening after seeing the numbers is how investors end up rationalising a 30% drawdown they would never have accepted on a blank page.
Frequently asked questions
Does a leaderboard rank guarantee future performance?
No. No rank guarantees the future; the leaderboard compares the past and the decision still rests on your risk tolerance and horizon.
Why is a higher-return account ranked lower?
Because rank blends several metrics; deeper drawdown or weaker consistency can push a higher return down. That is exactly how the table prevents return-only selection.
Are Demo accounts listed?
Yes, with an explicit account-type label. In proprietary methods, Demo accounts follow different settlement and guarantee rules and must be assessed separately.
How do I move from the table to a decision?
Narrow the list with filters, place the final four side by side in the comparison table, then calculate your net return in the TARAZ simulator.
The bottom line
The accounts leaderboard is the start of the search, not the end. Combine rank with drawdown, consistency and your own terms so the choice becomes “right for me” rather than “top of the list”. Continue with the comparison table guide.
Compare the track record, drawdown and costs of PAMM, MAM and copy-trading accounts, with the source and time of every figure.
Review and compare accounts Calculate scenarios and costsSubmit a verifiable track record so investors can review it against transparent criteria.
Discuss cooperationhttps://pamm.ir/blog/?r=-ijEAuWlUC-3MeAYj2X5xw
Rate this post
No ratings yet.
Related posts
Trading accounts guide: from filters to a final decision
This trading accounts guide maps the whole selection path: what gets listed, what filters mean, and where to stop before deciding.
Read moreSupport and legal: tickets, documents and the FAQ
Support handles personal issues, legal documents set general rules, and the FAQ answers common questions. This guide maps each channel and its safety limits.
Read moreLeaderboard or comparison table? When to use each
The leaderboard is for discovery and the comparison table is for the final choice. Confusing them either prolongs the decision or makes it shallow.
Read more

Comments (0)
No comments yet — be the first.