PAMM or MAM? Choosing between the two collective methods

PAMM and MAM are both “collective management”, but that is where the similarity ends. The right choice depends on how much control and visibility you want.

The core differences

Which one is for you?

If simplicity and full delegation matter most, look at PAMM. If you want your own sub-account and control over lot allocation, MAMM fits better. In both cases, read each account’s terms individually.

Compare both in the account list filtered by method, and read the structural guide to methods.

Frequently asked questions

Which one earns more? The method does not decide profit; the manager and their trading behaviour do. Comparing PAMM and MAM compares structure, not returns.

Is MAM lower risk? Not necessarily. A separate sub-account gives more visibility and control, but risk follows the manager’s behaviour and the market.

Can I use both at once? Yes; diversifying across methods is itself one level of diversification. Read each account’s style and terms separately.

Can I use both structures at the same time? Yes; there is no conflict. Many investors keep part of their capital in PAMM for simplicity and part in MAM for sub-account transparency. That is itself one level of diversification: structure diversification, separate from manager and method. Just manage both exit terms together.

Next step

See the complete catalogue in the methods guide for a fuller picture of your options.

A structure-choice checklist

• Sit down and write: how much control and visibility do I want?
• If simplicity wins, PAMM; if a separate sub-account, MAM
• Compare fee and exit terms of both
• Build experience with a small account in each structure
• Refresh your final decision with your own data

Compare accounts across both structures: See it.